Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy : Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform. / Lassen, David Dreyer; Serritslew, Søren.

I: American Political Science Review, Bind 105, Nr. 2, 2011, s. 238-258.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lassen, DD & Serritslew, S 2011, 'Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform', American Political Science Review, bind 105, nr. 2, s. 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541100013X

APA

Lassen, D. D., & Serritslew, S. (2011). Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541100013X

Vancouver

Lassen DD, Serritslew S. Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform. American Political Science Review. 2011;105(2):238-258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541100013X

Author

Lassen, David Dreyer ; Serritslew, Søren. / Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy : Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform. I: American Political Science Review. 2011 ; Bind 105, Nr. 2. s. 238-258.

Bibtex

@article{1c49d62e4042409da1ab3dca4f8b8075,
title = "Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform",
abstract = "Optimal jurisdiction size is a cornerstone of government design. A strong tradition in political thought argues that democracy thrives in smaller jurisdictions, but existing studies of the effects of jurisdiction size, mostly cross-sectional in nature, yield ambiguous results due to sorting effects and problems of endogeneity. We focus on internal political efficacy, a psychological condition that many see as necessary for high-quality participatory democracy. We identify a quasiexperiment, a large-scale municipal reform in Denmark, which allows us to estimate a causal effect of jurisdiction size on internal political efficacy. The reform, affecting some municipalities, but not all, was implemented by the central government, and resulted in exogenous, and substantial, changes in municipal population size. Based on survey data collected before and after the reform, we find, using various difference-in-difference and matching estimators, that jurisdiction size has a causal and sizeable detrimental effect on citizens' internal political efficacy.",
author = "Lassen, {David Dreyer} and S{\o}ren Serritslew",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1017/S000305541100013X",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "238--258",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy

T2 - Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform

AU - Lassen, David Dreyer

AU - Serritslew, Søren

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Optimal jurisdiction size is a cornerstone of government design. A strong tradition in political thought argues that democracy thrives in smaller jurisdictions, but existing studies of the effects of jurisdiction size, mostly cross-sectional in nature, yield ambiguous results due to sorting effects and problems of endogeneity. We focus on internal political efficacy, a psychological condition that many see as necessary for high-quality participatory democracy. We identify a quasiexperiment, a large-scale municipal reform in Denmark, which allows us to estimate a causal effect of jurisdiction size on internal political efficacy. The reform, affecting some municipalities, but not all, was implemented by the central government, and resulted in exogenous, and substantial, changes in municipal population size. Based on survey data collected before and after the reform, we find, using various difference-in-difference and matching estimators, that jurisdiction size has a causal and sizeable detrimental effect on citizens' internal political efficacy.

AB - Optimal jurisdiction size is a cornerstone of government design. A strong tradition in political thought argues that democracy thrives in smaller jurisdictions, but existing studies of the effects of jurisdiction size, mostly cross-sectional in nature, yield ambiguous results due to sorting effects and problems of endogeneity. We focus on internal political efficacy, a psychological condition that many see as necessary for high-quality participatory democracy. We identify a quasiexperiment, a large-scale municipal reform in Denmark, which allows us to estimate a causal effect of jurisdiction size on internal political efficacy. The reform, affecting some municipalities, but not all, was implemented by the central government, and resulted in exogenous, and substantial, changes in municipal population size. Based on survey data collected before and after the reform, we find, using various difference-in-difference and matching estimators, that jurisdiction size has a causal and sizeable detrimental effect on citizens' internal political efficacy.

U2 - 10.1017/S000305541100013X

DO - 10.1017/S000305541100013X

M3 - Journal article

VL - 105

SP - 238

EP - 258

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 33676631