Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation: A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation : A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer. / Otto, Friederike E.L.; Minnerop, Petra; Raju, Emmanuel; Harrington, Luke J.; Stuart-Smith, Rupert F.; Boyd, Emily; James, Rachel; Jones, Richard G.; Lauta, Kristian C.

I: Global Policy, Bind 14, Nr. 2, 2023, s. 416-419.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Otto, FEL, Minnerop, P, Raju, E, Harrington, LJ, Stuart-Smith, RF, Boyd, E, James, R, Jones, RG & Lauta, KC 2023, 'Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation: A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer', Global Policy, bind 14, nr. 2, s. 416-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174

APA

Otto, F. E. L., Minnerop, P., Raju, E., Harrington, L. J., Stuart-Smith, R. F., Boyd, E., James, R., Jones, R. G., & Lauta, K. C. (2023). Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation: A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer. Global Policy, 14(2), 416-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174

Vancouver

Otto FEL, Minnerop P, Raju E, Harrington LJ, Stuart-Smith RF, Boyd E o.a. Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation: A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer. Global Policy. 2023;14(2):416-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13174

Author

Otto, Friederike E.L. ; Minnerop, Petra ; Raju, Emmanuel ; Harrington, Luke J. ; Stuart-Smith, Rupert F. ; Boyd, Emily ; James, Rachel ; Jones, Richard G. ; Lauta, Kristian C. / Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation : A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer. I: Global Policy. 2023 ; Bind 14, Nr. 2. s. 416-419.

Bibtex

@article{6bf9b70ba34e431a8bc15e09f32450a1,
title = "Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation: A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer",
abstract = "In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.",
author = "Otto, {Friederike E.L.} and Petra Minnerop and Emmanuel Raju and Harrington, {Luke J.} and Stuart-Smith, {Rupert F.} and Emily Boyd and Rachel James and Jones, {Richard G.} and Lauta, {Kristian C.}",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/1758-5899.13174",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "416--419",
journal = "Global Policy",
issn = "1758-5880",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Law, justice and the role of courts in changing the social superstructure narrative in climate litigation

T2 - A Rejoinder to Benoit Mayer

AU - Otto, Friederike E.L.

AU - Minnerop, Petra

AU - Raju, Emmanuel

AU - Harrington, Luke J.

AU - Stuart-Smith, Rupert F.

AU - Boyd, Emily

AU - James, Rachel

AU - Jones, Richard G.

AU - Lauta, Kristian C.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.

AB - In the article Causality and the fate of climate litigation: The role of the social superstructure narrative, we argue that an enhanced and wider understanding of attribution science will shape the social superstructure narrative of climate change. This social superstructure narrative influences courts in their decision-making. Benoit Mayer, in the same issue, has commented on our article. We use this rejoinder to clarify three elements of Mayer's comments in his response to help avoid any misconception of our argument or misunderstanding of the German Civil Code and thus hopefully enrich the discussion. These clarifications speak to the role of the courts first to preserve the rule of law and second in the context of climate change with the third clarification relating to the legal basis of a specific claim under German law.

U2 - 10.1111/1758-5899.13174

DO - 10.1111/1758-5899.13174

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85151940549

VL - 14

SP - 416

EP - 419

JO - Global Policy

JF - Global Policy

SN - 1758-5880

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 344526271